← Back to Scanner

@martian-engineering/lossless-claw Security Audit Report

🔭 Continuously monitored by ClawSecure Watchtower
Source:
SHA-256:

@martian-engineering/lossless-claw is an AI agent skill, created by Josh Lehman <josh@martian.engineering> and published at Martian-Engineering/lossless-claw. ClawSecure audited @martian-engineering/lossless-claw across 51 files through the 3-Layer Audit Protocol covering all ten OWASP ASI Top 10 categories, assigning a security score of 0/100 (Critical). The 15 findings concentrate in Code Injection, Supply Chain and Malicious Code, including Vulnerability in dompurify@3.4.15: DOMPurify… and Attempts to access sensitive file: .ssh/. 10 were rated high or critical severity.

Is @martian-engineering/lossless-claw safe?

ClawSecure audited @martian-engineering/lossless-claw and assigned a security score of 0/100 (Critical), identifying 15 findings across Code Injection and Supply Chain. Review the findings below before installing.

What did ClawSecure find in @martian-engineering/lossless-claw?

ClawSecure identified 15 findings in @martian-engineering/lossless-claw, concentrated in Code Injection, Supply Chain and Malicious Code. 10 were rated high or critical severity. The most severe include Vulnerability in dompurify@3.4.15: DOMPurify… and Attempts to access sensitive file: .ssh/.

How was @martian-engineering/lossless-claw audited?

ClawSecure ran @martian-engineering/lossless-claw through its 3-Layer Audit Protocol with full OWASP ASI Top 10 coverage, scanning 51 files from Martian-Engineering/lossless-claw.

What does a score of 0 mean?

ClawSecure assigned @martian-engineering/lossless-claw a security score of 0/100, placing it in the Critical range. This is driven by 15 findings led by Code Injection that should be addressed before use. ClawSecure derives this score with a weighted deduction model (critical -20, high -10, medium -5, low -2 from a base of 100).

Audit Findings for @martian-engineering/lossless-claw

ClawSecure detected 15 security findings in @martian-engineering/lossless-claw, spanning Code Injection, Supply Chain, Malicious Code and Permissions Manifest.

Showing the 12 highest-severity of 15 findings. The full interactive list appears below.

3-Layer Audit Protocol

Security Recommendations for @martian-engineering/lossless-claw

Eliminate dynamic code execution
@martian-engineering/lossless-claw evaluates code at runtime (for example eval or dynamic exec). Remove dynamic evaluation of untrusted input, and where code generation is unavoidable, sandbox it and validate every input.
Update and pin dependencies
@martian-engineering/lossless-claw depends on packages with supply-chain risk. Pin every dependency to an exact version, update packages with known CVEs to patched releases, and re-audit after each change. ClawSecure checks every dependency against known CVE databases.
Audit external network connections
@martian-engineering/lossless-claw connects to external endpoints. Verify every outbound connection goes to a trusted destination. Unauthorized callbacks are a primary indicator of ClawHavoc malware and data exfiltration. ClawSecure's proprietary engine monitors for known malicious endpoints including C2 infrastructure.

Related Security Research

Why Generic Scanners Fail at AI Agent Security→Beyond Static Scans: Why ClawSecure Verifies Agentic Intent→

Related AI Agent Security Audits

homunculus-codeScore 5/100byterover-cliScore 0/100explain-code-for-developerScore 0/100explain-code-for-developerScore 0/100explain-code-for-developerScore 0/100

Scanned on November 2, 2026. @martian-engineering/lossless-claw is one of thousands of agents audited by ClawSecure from the community-curated awesome-openclaw-skills list and the openclaw/skills repository.

Start Your Free Scan